Please log in to watch this conference skillscast.
Static type systems are the world’s most widely applied formal method, in daily use by millions of programmers.
The trouble is that weak type systems give types a bad name; they get in your way and stop you from writing the programs you want to write. And that leads to the familiar but fruitless static-vs-dynamic debate which I hope to avoid entirely.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:
- Jenny Martin and Pete Buckney's BDD From Start to Finish - Successful Delivery through Continuous Collaboration (in London on 20th - 22nd March 2017)
- Martine Devos' Certified Scrum Product Owner (in London on 6th - 7th April 2017)
- DDD eXchange 2017 (in London on 27th - 28th April 2017)
- Gáspár Nagy's Developing with SpecFlow (in London on 28th - 30th June 2017)
Adventures with types
Simon Peyton Jones, MA, MBCS, CEng, graduated from Trinity College Cambridge in 1980. Simon was a key contributor to the design of the now-standard functional language Haskell, and is the lead designer of the widely-used Glasgow Haskell Compiler (GHC). He has written two textbooks about the implementation of functional languages.