Please log in to watch this conference skillscast.
Recently, I've seen several systems with test code that is intended to be "business facing" but that, in practice, is just getting in the way. The test code is bloated and repetitive, and the language of the tests doesn't really explain the original intent.
The tests that I see often remind me of a previous attempt to allow non-technical people to work with computers: Cobol. The features that helped to make it hugely successful, its "English syntax" and flat structure, are also barriers to abstraction and modularity--the techniques we need to cope with scale. Is writing everything out in full the only way we can get our point across?
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:
- Jenny Martin and Pete Buckney's BDD From Start to Finish - Successful Delivery through Continuous Collaboration (in London on 26th - 28th February 2018)
- Gojko Adzic's Specification by Example: From User Stories to Acceptance Tests (in London on 27th - 28th June 2018)
- The Conference formerly known as Agile Testing & BDD eXchange 2018 (in London on 8th - 9th November 2018)
"Given When Then" considered harmful
Steve was a pioneer of Agile software development in the UK, he has built applications for banks, ISPs, financial data providers, and specialist software companies. He has given training courses in Europe, America, and Asia.